 |
 |
|
|
The trading system is based on neural nets
Hello Olexandr - Kub! 10 days ago I decided to follow the trades of your EA in my real account. I traded
almost every signal and the result was extraordinary. Since this is your system,
I want to share these profits with you, or if you are not interessted I would wire
an amount to a social institution in the Ukraine for example a children helping
foundation, or even both. It is not a really big amount but actually the account
is up more than 100% (I took some more risk than your EA did in this 10 days, lol
;) ty, Andreas 2007.12.19 00:58
bbaass писал(а): You don't have a sense of humour! ;o))))By the way I respect to your EA's result,but I am sure that External inputs are banned, as you can see in page: http://championship.mql4.com/2007/rules bbaass писал(а): If i am not mistaken Better answered that his EA gets the secret data (inside information directly from Bernanke, Trish etc.) but not the commands. It is not a hard task to generate the commands having such data. Of course Better will leave a part of his prize 40K in favour of his friends Trishe, Bernanke and others who was helping him in winning.your EA get the commands from outside, so I can't undestand what is the duty of PNN here? And the duty of PNN is simply to control the signal level between transmitter and receiver. 2007.12.19 00:37
Better wrote: your EA get the commands from outside,bbaass писал(а): Dear Mr. Better , Congratulations for your Excellent EA, I have some questions about your EA. 1. Is there any relations between your EA and your ICQ Number? http://championship.mql4.com/2007/users/Better/journal/223 Of course, ICQ number is the main part of the EA! Have you read that the EA has an artificial intellect? Yes, it has. Sometimes the EA gets in touch via ICQ with advisors of Trishe and Bernanke and
asks them what to do - buy or sell. And when the market is quiet, the EA browses various forums and sometimes answers strange questions. ------------------------ Sincerely yours, Kub so I can't undestand what is the duty of PNN here? By the way I respect to your EA's result,but I am sure that External inputs are banned, as you can see in page: http://championship.mql4.com/2007/rules  2007.12.19 00:09
GA for optimization:... Max{NNProfit}, where NNProfit=f(Long Patter Ema i , Ema i(period),Nro Neurons Hideen Layer)....FOR MLP For PNN is more easy,,,inclusive,,,yo could use metatrader optimizer ( have a GA in the Optimizer) like a unsupervized training... Look 'Artificial Intellegence' Reshetov's work, he uses GA from optimizer to train a simple layer perceptron to get wij ( like unsupervised learning) , that´s a "different" way to train..... the clasical way in this case is delta rule. .. . my englishhh es "maloooooo"... Saludos :) 2007.12.18 22:11
Better wrote:
And at last, but not least: how did you selected the input parameters? Have you
used some genetic algorithms od just plain observation? I haven't used GA, only plain observationsThat's very impressive. Spasiba. 2007.12.18 21:36
emsi писал(а): NoI understad that both the indicators you use and the NN itself are to be secret but I'm interested if you could reveal the rough number of inputs to your network. Did you used a time-series approach? I understand that the output is only one:
a value in <-1;1> and you split it into 3 parts meaning sell, dont-know and
buy. You wrote that it's a modified PN so I guess that it's splitted like in this
work: http://www.mini.pw.edu.pl/~jaruszewicz/FIN-PRE-MJR-doktorat-3v02.pdf or is it completly different? I mean grouping some inputs in a sub NN. I havent read this paper. Can't read in Polish.Do you have any stats about your 3 sub-EA forecasting accuracy? I mean how many times there was forecast to buy while actually there shoud be sell or vice versa? On the Reports page one can see that the success rate for long, and short is about 2/3 (66.31 and 66.49 percent) with amazing accuracy. It can't be a coincidence! How does it look fore each of your sub-EA? And at last, but not least: how did you selected the input parameters? Have you used some genetic algorithms od just plain observation? A bonus question :) I don't know You wrote that you are a trader. If so: if your EA were revealed to the public what would be the impact to the market if any? emsi wrote: Is there any chance I could get a reply? I would be very thankfull.Hello! First of all I would like to congratulate you the leading of the championship! I'm starting a PhD course now and it's about an automated trading systems, including (but not limited to) neural networks approach and I found your EA extremly interesting due to its successfullness. There's been a number of works in this subject, but none has proofed to work with such efficiency. I understad that both the indicators you use and the NN itself are to be secret but I'm interested if you could reveal the rough number of inputs to your network. Is it among 4 to 8, 8 to 15, 15 to 30 or more? Did you used a time-series approach? I understand that the output is only one: a value in <-1;1> and you split it into 3 parts meaning sell, dont-know and buy. You wrote that it's a modified PN so I guess that it's splitted like in this work: http://www.mini.pw.edu.pl/~jaruszewicz/FIN-PRE-MJR-doktorat-3v02.pdf or is it completly different? I mean grouping some inputs in a sub NN. Do you have any stats about your 3 sub-EA forecasting accuracy? I mean how many times there was forecast to buy while actually there shoud be sell or vice versa? On the Reports page one can see that the success rate for long, and short is about 2/3 (66.31 and 66.49 percent) with amazing accuracy. It can't be a coincidence! How does it look fore each of your sub-EA? And at last, but not least: how did you selected the input parameters? Have you used some genetic algorithms od just plain observation? A bonus question :) You wrote that you are a trader. If so: if your EA were revealed to the public what would be the impact to the market if any? Regards. 2007.12.18 18:44
|
Sponsors
Media Sponsor
Organizer
|
QUE GRUPO MAS SELECTO DE PASTELES ¡¡¡¡