Hi Better !

I'm sorry to say that your system dosen't cost one penny .

I studied all your trades . So far 380 trades , less than three months ,so I can say over 1000 lots in this modest account. If you want to use large money, in different markets, in different time frames ,then the money managers will lose their shorts .

How comes that your EA opens new position in a new bar and exits in the same bar. But this is not trading , this can be something else .

For sure , this Ea ,if will stay for a long time in trading at the end will lose all account . What I like to You that you are fighting with money management .

Belive me !- This is not trading . If the banks will use this system ,they will go bankrupt. Do you know what does it mean for a Bank Trader to put the initial stop 60-80 pips below the low of the signal bar. I saw over 200 real automated trading systems. But your system is not for trading ,sorry to say that . I never can use one system to enter and exit in the same bar. no ,no, no,,, ,,,, ,,,, not in trading my friend . the trading is not a joke , can give us a nice cutting hair .

the trading is not a joke again

Don't deceive yourself from the result . Be carefull

all the best

I will like to buy or have your EA because i have been taking wrong decision with manual trade, so you can e-mail to me quadricanna@yahoo.com

Better,

Can you share with us the backtesting results for 2006 and 2007 using the strategy tester reporting? I am interested in seeing the results trade by trade.

I'm VERY concerned about the legitimacy of Better's current win. The rules categorically state that no external inputs are allowed. The fact the Better has managed to develop a satellite based ray gun that can read the minds of the likes of Bernanke, and then transfer this information via his ICQ number into his Expert, shows that Better has totally gone against the spirit of this competition. I would ask the judges of this competition that Better be immediately disqualified based on irrefutable evidence I have uncovered while reading my tea leaves this morning.

QUE GRUPO MAS SELECTO DE PASTELES ¡¡¡¡

Hello Olexandr - Kub!

10 days ago I decided to follow the trades of your EA in my real account. I traded almost every signal and the result was extraordinary. Since this is your system, I want to share these profits with you, or if you are not interessted I would wire an amount to a social institution in the Ukraine for example a children helping foundation, or even both. It is not a really big amount but actually the account is up more than 100% (I took some more risk than your EA did in this 10 days, lol ;)

If you find time you could post here in the forum an answer or reach me at: pinktree(at)buba. ch

ty, Andreas

You don't have a sense of humour! ;o))))

If i am not mistaken Better answered that his EA gets the secret data (inside information directly from Bernanke, Trish etc.) but not the commands. It is not a hard task to generate the commands having such data. Of course Better will leave a part of his prize 40K in favour of his friends Trishe, Bernanke and others who was helping him in winning.
And the duty of PNN is simply to control the signal level between transmitter and receiver.

your EA get the commands from outside,

so I can't undestand what is the duty of PNN here?


By the way I respect to your EA's result,but

I am sure that External inputs are banned,

as you can see in page:

http://championship.mql4.com/2007/rules

GA for optimization:...

Max{NNProfit}, where NNProfit=f(Long Patter Ema i , Ema i(period),Nro Neurons Hideen Layer)....FOR MLP

For PNN is more easy,,,inclusive,,,yo could use metatrader optimizer ( have a GA in the Optimizer) like a unsupervized training...

Look 'Artificial Intellegence' Reshetov's work, he uses GA from optimizer to train a simple layer perceptron to get wij ( like unsupervised learning) , that´s a "different" way to train..... the clasical way in this case is delta rule. .. .

my englishhh es "maloooooo"...

Saludos

:)